- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:45:22 +0200
- To: "John Foliot" <john@foliot.ca>, "Steve Faulkner" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:35:09 +0200, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree vigilance is the key, that is why i am subscribed to the commit > watchers mailing list, read the IRC logs and read up on the WHATWG > mailing > list on a regular basis. I have now also subscribed to the whatwg list, > which is what is practically required of any WHATWG 'community group' > member if they want to participate. So simply subscribing to the mailing > list achieves the same outcome without supporting the pretence of the > 'community group', which as we all know is just a mechanism for WHATWG to > get a patent policy. You're so negative man. And I have hard time seeing why. WHATWG is a community. W3C provides a legal framework for communities. WHATWG uses that happily. There's no pretense. In fact the WHATWG communicated quite clearly why it was set up. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 08:46:52 UTC