- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:36:12 +0100
- To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Steve Faulkner" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>, "Jeff Jaffe" <jeff@w3.org>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:08:16 +0100, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: >> Is anyone really doubting that the editor will get to the change? > > Yes i am seriously doubting it, thats why i asked. No changes have > occured to the canvas 2d context spec since the revert was made on it, I > do not > think it is a situation that should be repeated with the HTML5 spec and > if it does occur I want to see it nipped in the bud before it causes > problems. I think the problem is doubting the editor will get to the "revert request". Because the moment someone who is not editing HTML5 starts editing the non-canonical CVS version of it, trying to clean up that mess will take hours. It's a lot of make work and as you indicate will just result in the W3C copy not getting updated until the underlying issue is resolved. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 11 November 2011 11:37:09 UTC