- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:02:30 +0000
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+VkyDv0DNSZQEvaVXXyfw5UKt=DPJsM65+MmnDgiZAHEpA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jonas, My perspective is different as I am mostly concerned with the accessibility aspects of HTML5. The work and discussion on this occurs almost exclusively in the public W3C space on the bugs , mailing lists and teleconferences. regards Stevef On 11 November 2011 10:38, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Steve Faulkner > <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Jonas, > > > > you wrote: > > > > "It feels very unfortunate that these days the majority of emails in > > this list are regarding process and not regarding the technical > > discussions of what's in the HTML5 spec." > > > > I would suggest its the editors regular attempts at the monkeywrenching > of > > the html wg process is the reason for such emails. > > > > I would also suggest that the reason why technical issues are not > disucussed > > on the html wg list is that the majority of the activity occurs on the > bugs. > > That appears to be by design. I would very much like to see the technical > > discussion occuring in the bugs moved back to the HTML list as I would > find > > it much easier to keep track of what was being discussed. > > > > > >>Is anyone really doubting that the editor will get to the change? > > > > Yes i am seriously doubting it, thats why i asked. No changes have > occured > > to the canvas 2d context spec since the revert was made on it, I do not > > think it is a situation that should be repeated with the HTML5 spec and > if > > it does occur I want to see it nipped in the bud before it causes > problems. > > > > I am perfectly happy with having the thread moved to www.archive, but I > > reserve the right to initiate such discussion on the html wg list. > > I disagree that it's good use of the HTML list's time. But it's the > chair's decision and not mine. > > I also don't think that a lot of technical discussions are happening > in the bugs. As far as I can tell the discussions have moved to the > WHATWG list and private threads as they provide a more productive > climate. > > I think this is very unfortunate. > > / Jonas > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com | www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives - dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/ Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Friday, 11 November 2011 11:03:29 UTC