[wbs] response to 'Grant II: Grant of License for Contributed Test Cases Published Outside a W3C Recommendation'
[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-66 - Image Analysis Heuristics - Straw Poll for Objections'
[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-90: Removing the figure Element - Straw Poll for Objections'
[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element - Straw Poll for Objections'
[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-93: Removing the details Element - Straw Poll for Objections'
[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-95: Removing the hidden Attribute - Straw Poll for Objections'
[widgets] Re: i18n comments:
Admin changes to obsolete WebSimpleDB in deference to IndexedDB
Applying design to W3C specs
border-left-width-036
CSS display:table-*, white-space:pre, and position:absolute interaction
Fwd: [widgets] Re: i18n comments:
Fwd: PFWG comments on View Mode Media Feature
ISSUE-4 - versioning/DOCTYPEs
ISSUE-90 - Removing the figure Element - Straw Poll for Objections
Rationale for aside Element Issue 91 Straw Poll
Rationale for details Element Issue 93 Straw Poll
Rationale for figure Element Issue 90 Straw Poll
Rationale for hidden Attribute Issue 95 Straw Poll
Rationale for meter Attribute Issue 97 Straw Poll
Rationale for progress Element Issue 96 Straw Poll
The Access Element: Enabling Generic Document Accessibility [PFWG Proposed Internal Draft, 2010-05-19]
the unintuitive semantics of “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels” (RFC 2119)
Timed tracks
Last message date: Friday, 28 May 2010 06:35:10 UTC