- From: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 07:25:17 -0400
- To: Addison Phillips <addison@amazon.com>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>, Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Hi Richard, Thank you for sending in comments 15, 17, 18, 19 and 20. Is there a number 16 or other comments you will send? Also, will Addison send us an e-mail or should we consider the comments you already submitted as the final comments from the I18N WG for the P&C spec? Re comment #20, I appreciate you marking this as closed since a change like this is indeed too late. -Art Barstow On May 20, 2010, at 12:32 PM, ext Richard Ishida wrote: > Hi Art, > > We discussed this at the i18n telecon last night and Addison has an > action > to respond to you quickly to (I hope) let you know that all is ok. > > However, I gave the document one more read through myself this > afternoon > just for good measure, and I noticed a small number of editorial > nits that I > will send along in a few minutes in separate emails. > > One additional comment that's not worth a separate email: Yves > Savourel's > name is missing the final 'l' in the acknowledgements section. > > As always, a summary of all our comments can be found at > http://www.org/International/reviews/0907-widgets-pc/ with links to > email > threads. Comments on a white background are deemed to be fixed/ > closed. > > I added one substantive comment (number 20) that reflects something I > mentioned in an email on 26th March, but I am assuming that it is > now too > late to change it, so I marked the comment as closed. (If it is > not too > late to change it, please consider doing so, of course.) I will > send an > email for that one too, just to keep the books tidy. > > Cheers, > RI > > ============ > Richard Ishida > Internationalization Lead > W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) > > http://www.w3.org/International/ > http://rishida.net/ > > > > From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] > Sent: 12 May 2010 17:14 > To: Richard Ishida; Addison Phillips; Felix Sasaki > Cc: Marcos Caceres; Robin Berjon; Steven Pemberton; Doug Schepers; > Charles > McCathieNevile; www-archive > Subject: Fwd: [widgets] Re: i18n comments: > > Hi All, > > Marcos has completed all of the changes to the Widget Packaging and > Configuration (P&C) spec related to the new <span> element and dir > attribute > and the removal of the ITS references. The latest Editor's Draft that > includes these changes is: > > [ED] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/ > > Would the I18N WG please review the changes and submit comments to > public-webapps? > > Given the last formal publication of this spec was a CR and we > consider the > <span> and dir changes as a replacement for ITS, our plan (once we > have > sufficient implementation data) is to move directly to PR and not > publish > another LC or CR. As such, we want to know if the I18N WG sees any > issues > with [ED]. > > -Thanks, Art Barstow > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com> > Date: April 6, 2010 10:05:33 AM EDT > To: Addison Phillips <addison@amazon.com>, Marcos Caceres > <marcosc@opera.com>, Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>, > "Martin J. > Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org> > Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org> > Subject: [widgets] Re: i18n comments: > > Hi Marcos, All, > > Has the I18N Core WG reviewed Marcos' latest proposal? If yes, > where can we > find their comments; if no, when can we expect a reply? > > -Art Barstow > > On Mar 30, 2010, at 11:07 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > > On 29/03/10 5:16 PM, Phillips, Addison wrote: > This doesn't make any sense to me. I think you are over-thinking this. > > The author element contains the author's *NAME*. It can also > include an href > and an email attribute. UTR#36 refers explicitly to IRIs and IDNA > addresses, > which would be the values of these attributes. However, it does NOT > refer to > plain text (the body of the element 'author') which is what the 'dir' > attribute really applies to. To not provide bidirectional overrides > for the > author's name strikes me as incredibly short sighted, given that > you can > override any higher-level element. To have one place in your > configuration > document that requires controls is not to improve security, it is > to reduce > usability. > > I've updated the spec and the RelaxNG to include "rlo" and "lro". > > It would make far more sense for you to cite UTR#36 with regard to an > implementations presentation of the href or email attributes, > suggesting (or > forbidding) the application of the dir attribute to these values. > But the > body of the<author> element needs the bidi markup and should not > depend on > Unicode bidi controls. > > I trashed the old note, made this new note. > > [[ > Note: Implementations intending to display IRIs and IDNA addresses > found > in the configuration document are strongly encouraged to follow the > security advice given in [UTR36]. This could include, for example, > behaving as if the dir attribute had no effect on any IRI attributes, > path attributes, and the author element's email attribute. > ]] > > IRI attributes, path attributes are defined in the specification. > > Any better? > > Kind regards, > Marcos > > > -- > Marcos Caceres > Opera Software > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2866 - Release Date: > 05/11/10 > 19:40:00 >
Received on Friday, 21 May 2010 11:26:33 UTC