- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:31:58 +0100
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Larry Masinter, Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:37:37 -0800: [...] > It might help to use "this specification" rather than > "this document" to avoid overloading "document". > > The rules of this specification apply to documents and > also to processors. +1 A purely editorial improvement. Although "this document" is described as "this specification" in the previous sentence. > * They apply to documents meeting the requirements > of HTML4, HTML5 and XHTML for documents. > * They apply to processors meeting the requirements > of HTML5 for parsing rules. > > Do I have that right? I think the Abstract section of the draft first has a sentence about where its /syntax/ is valid: "in the HTML5 and XHTML5 members of the HTML family". Then it talks about where the /interpretation/ (aka parsing rules) will apply. So in a way it has this already. Except for the detail that I took up below, and which Manu has already agreed to. > -----Original Message----- > On Behalf Of Leif Halvard Silli > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 12:41 PM > > Manu Sporny, Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:53:58 -0500: > >> Feedback on the current draft would be appreciated: >> >> http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/rdfa.html > > In another thread I commented the following part of HTML+RDFa: > > ]]The rules defined in this document not only apply to HTML5 documents > in non-XML and XML mode, but also to HTML4 documents interpreted > through the HTML5 parsing rules.[[ > > My question/suggestion: Shouldn't that sentence also say that HTML+RDFa > not only applies to HTML4 but also to XHTML documents when "interpreted > through the HTML5 parsing rules"? -- leif halvard silli
Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 19:32:34 UTC