- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:37:37 -0800
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
What does it mean for a document to "be" an "XHTML document" but be "interpreted through the HTML5 parsing rules"? Given that any string of characters can be interpreted through the HTML5 parsing rules, I think it might be useful to try to be more precise here. It might help to use "this specification" rather than "this document" to avoid overloading "document". The rules of this specification apply to documents and also to processors. * They apply to documents meeting the requirements of HTML4, HTML5 and XHTML for documents. * They apply to processors meeting the requirements of HTML5 for parsing rules. Do I have that right? Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net -----Original Message----- From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Leif Halvard Silli Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 12:41 PM To: Manu Sporny Cc: HTMLWG WG Subject: Re: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request Manu Sporny, Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:53:58 -0500: > Feedback on the current draft would be appreciated: > > http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/rdfa.html In another thread I commented the following part of HTML+RDFa: ]]The rules defined in this document not only apply to HTML5 documents in non-XML and XML mode, but also to HTML4 documents interpreted through the HTML5 parsing rules.[[ My question/suggestion: Shouldn't that sentence also say that HTML+RDFa not only applies to HTML4 but also to XHTML documents when "interpreted through the HTML5 parsing rules"? -- leif halvard silli
Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 18:38:19 UTC