- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:32:27 -0600
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
I don't quite understand closing an issue with an expectation that more work will be done on it later. I took a brief look at the proposal... no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0683.html I'm not persuaded that it's not cost-effective to just keep head/@profile in HTML 5. My position remains: let's keep metadata profiles (head/@profile) in HTML for use in GRDDL etc. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jul/0571.html I'm inclined to object to this CfC, but I'll stand by to learn a little more about the situation first. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 15:32:33 UTC