Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML

Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
> 
> On 28 May 2009, at 19:21, Shelley Powers wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I wasn't going to comment on it, but since you have been pushing it: I
>>> would like to hold everybody to the same standard.
>>>
>>> "incorporating a negative emotional tone in a writing can be an eff, 
>>> even
>>> pos, tool"
>>>
>>> http://twitter.com/burningbird/status/1848643851
>>>
>>> "Or you could be like me, and slather it on, like bar-b-que sauce on a
>>> roasting pig. The sweet, spicy kind."
>>
>>
>> Sorry, doesn't fly Sam. And you may want to consider not acting as 
>> papa to
>> me, because I'm older than you. Correcting what you perceive to be
>> weaknesses in my general behavior, or my general writing, outside of
>> anything to do with the immediate discussion or even HTML effort, is
>> beginning to irritate me.
>>
>> [etc.]
> 
> Can we please not have this on public-html? public-html, per charter, is 
> a mailing list for technical discussion within the WG. It does nothing 
> but lower the signal:noise ratio of the list, and makes me less inclined 
> to participate.

Agreed.  I'll try to do better in the future.

> -- 
> Geoffrey Sneddon

- Sam Ruby

Received on Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:38:47 UTC