- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 12:17:55 +0200
- To: "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
Can I still expect a reply to the other questions I raised in the email? Because this was a mostly rethorical question and the least interesting one, at least to me. Thanks. On Thu, 28 May 2009 20:12:31 +0200, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> On Thu, 28 May 2009 16:20:52 +0200, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> >> wrote: >>> Permit me to turn that around... can we precisely identify in which >>> contexts the "#content-type-sniffing:-feed-or-html" section is >>> meant to apply? >> Doesn't HTML5 do that? > > HTML 5 does do that. There have been assertions that HTML 5 defines > operational behavior that may vary between applications[1]. This may or > may not be an example of what Roy was referring to. Even if it is an > example, it may be one that we come to rough consensus on anyway. > > Without necessarily resolving each at this time, I would like to collect > a representative sample of the behaviors that Roy was referring to. At > this time, I would like to thank Henri Sivonen for providing such an > example[2]. > > - Sam Ruby > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009May/0513.html > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009May/0525.html -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 29 May 2009 10:18:40 UTC