Re: XMLLiteral handling in RDFa in HTML

On 28 May 2009, at 19:21, Shelley Powers wrote:

> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>  
> wrote:
>>
>> I wasn't going to comment on it, but since you have been pushing  
>> it: I
>> would like to hold everybody to the same standard.
>>
>> "incorporating a negative emotional tone in a writing can be an  
>> eff, even
>> pos, tool"
>>
>> http://twitter.com/burningbird/status/1848643851
>>
>> "Or you could be like me, and slather it on, like bar-b-que sauce  
>> on a
>> roasting pig. The sweet, spicy kind."
>
>
> Sorry, doesn't fly Sam. And you may want to consider not acting as  
> papa to
> me, because I'm older than you. Correcting what you perceive to be
> weaknesses in my general behavior, or my general writing, outside of
> anything to do with the immediate discussion or even HTML effort, is
> beginning to irritate me.
>
> [etc.]

Can we please not have this on public-html? public-html, per charter,  
is a mailing list for technical discussion within the WG. It does  
nothing but lower the signal:noise ratio of the list, and makes me  
less inclined to participate.


--
Geoffrey Sneddon

Received on Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:11:53 UTC