- From: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 11:27:07 +1000
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- CC: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
On 19 May 2009, at 19:09, Dan Brickley wrote: > But I don't want people to have to use two vocabs for saying pretty > basic things. Is "foaf:myersBriggs" a pretty basic thing? > If you want an exact 1:1 representation of vCard, then the > vcard-in-rdf docs are your best bet. If you want any of the semi- > random > mischief in the FOAF spec, you should also be able to mention an > address > without needing a 2nd namespace... Much, is not all, of the "FOAF Basics" [1] is a repeat of vCard semantics. But if you did not want a second namespace, then reusing ontologies is a lost cause! I thought the Semantic Web / Linked Data was all about this ;-) Cheers... Renato Iannella NICTA [1] http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2009 01:42:06 UTC