W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2009

RE: Survey of list on the Unified Social XG Charter (Feedback

From: Christine Perey <cperey@perey.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:12:41 +0100
To: "'Renato Iannella'" <renato@nicta.com.au>, "'Harry Halpin'" <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
Cc: "'Tim Anglade'" <tim.anglade@af83.com>, "'Krishna Sankar \(ksankar\)'" <ksankar@cisco.com>, "'Fabien Gandon'" <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>, "'Karl Dubost'" <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>, "'Mauro Nunez'" <mauro@w3.org>, "'Ann Bassetti'" <ann.bassetti@boeing.com>, "'Dominique Hazael-Massieux'" <dom@w3.org>, "'Miquel Martin'" <miquel.martin@nw.neclab.eu>, <www-archive@w3.org>, <danbri@danbri.org>, "'Appelquist, Daniel, VF-Group'" <Daniel.Appelquist@vodafone.com>
Message-ID: <E398C72418654CF0BF3A01C290F48A4E@T60>
I was unable to focus on this the past 2 days (and will not be able to
provide much attention/feedback today), but I hope that the detailed
comments made on Monday on this topic were sufficient/appropriate.

I have had 2 minutes to glance at the updated survey as of 9 AM CET. Renato
brings up very valid recommendations. 

In addition:

the questions about if a respondent is a W3C member (Q11 and Q12) should be
folded into the top section entitled "information about you" then make it
clear that the survey is open to all, regardless of if you are a member or

Q13 should be dropped. We know that there are at least 4 members willing to
sponsor the XG and this is an administrative question.

I find that Question #14 is a red herring. It is not needed. It confuses the
issue by asking everyone to go backwards. We have dedicated considerable
effort to make the Unified Social XG Charter reflect all the inputs/outputs
of the workshop participants. The focus of attention should be only ONE
charter: the Unified Social XG charter.

Concur with Renato that Q15 is out of order. It needs to  be moved up to the
first section, either as (becoming) question #1 or between current questions
#2 and #3.

By way of this message I am adding Dan Applequist to this thread. 



-----Original Message-----
From: Renato Iannella [mailto:renato@nicta.com.au] 
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 6:11 AM
To: Harry Halpin
Cc: Tim Anglade; Krishna Sankar (ksankar); Fabien Gandon; Karl Dubost; Mauro
Nunez; Ann Bassetti; Dominique Hazael-Massieux; Miquel Martin; Christine
Perey; www-archive@w3.org; danbri@danbri.org
Subject: Re: Survey of list on the Unified Social XG Charter (Feedback

On 27 Feb 2009, at 14:33, Harry Halpin wrote:

> Please do send comments ASAP, I have been waiting 24 hours for 
> comments before sending out in the interest of being polite. However, 
> given the telecon time is approaching, I do not want to wait anymore.

Q1 - please split into two questions as there is a mixture of points trying
to be addressed here. This questions should ask, "if there was multiple task
forces, which group would you primarily be interested in"
(and remove the second bullet point). Then Q15 should be moved as the next
question (or even the first question).

Q3 - the Yes/No answer does not match the question. Answers should be
"single teleconf" and "multiple teleconfs" and "single list" and "multiple
lists" - and they need to be check boxes.
(also remove the last sentence as that is an opinion)

Q14 - the Yes/No answer does not match the question. Answers should be "Edit
the original smaller charter" and "Edit the new larger charter"

Cheers...  Renato Iannella
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 08:37:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:33:34 UTC