- From: Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:11:35 +0900
- To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, www-validator@w3.org
Hi Steven, > @2008-09-30 14:00 +0100: > The idea in regards to the HTML WG was brought about by david dorwards > suggestion that it is something that the WG charter covers. > > I certainly understand if this is not something that the HTML WG to be > actively involved in , but it is good to get your feedback so if there > is any development, its result does not upset any applecarts within > the HTML WG. I think having a normative spec for ARIA is HTML 5 is absolutely something that the HTML WG needs to produce. But having a spec of HTML 4.01 + ARIA is not. And if the need to produce a HTML 4.01 + ARIA DTD and have support in validator.w3.org for it is urgent, then I really don't think taking a discussion about it to the HTML WG as whole to try to get consensus on it is what you want to do. --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2008 13:12:16 UTC