Fwd: tag: uri scheme

Hi Tim,

I am a Chair of the W3C's Web Applications WG [WebApps] and in the  
context of our Widgets spec [Widgets], particularly Requirements #6  
[Req-6] and #37 [Reg-37], we are interested in the tag: scheme.

Marcos Caceres, the Editor of our Widgets spec, asked me to contact  
to you re this scheme. For a bit of context, please see his email  
below as well as a summary of the Widget scheme issue in [Widget- 
scheme].

If you have any info to share, we would greatly appreciate it.

Here is one the latest discussion threads we've had on this scheme:

  <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008OctDec/ 
0299.html>

-Regards, Art Barstow

[WebApps] <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Main_Page>
[Widgets] <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/>
[Req-6] <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/#r6.-addressing>
[Req-37] <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/#r37.->
[Widget-scheme] <http://tinyurl.com/69yegh>

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "ext Marcos Caceres" <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
> Date: December 6, 2008 11:56:24 AM EST
> To: "Arthur Barstow" <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
> Subject: tag: uri scheme
>
> Hi Art,
> I'm wondering if you could do me a huge favor. In light of the tag:
> uri scheme potentially meeting our needs in regards to a widget  uri,
> I was wondering if you could take the time to contact Tim Kindberg
> (timothy@hpl.hp.com), who created the tag: scheme, and possibly ask
> him to weight in on the discussion on the packaging list, web apps
> list, and the TAG list. It would be great if you could point him to
> our requirements R6 and R37 and maybe some of the relevant emails. It
> would also be a big help if you could also ask him if he managed to
> resolve  i18n issues with tag:; And if no, what would need to be done.
>
> Kind regards,
> Marcos
>
> -- 
> Marcos Caceres
> http://datadriven.com.au

Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2008 17:16:39 UTC