- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:44:21 +0100
- To: "Dean Edridge" <dean@55.co.nz>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:25:27 +0100, Dean Edridge <dean@55.co.nz> wrote:
> Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> There is no "the one syntax"
>
> But there could be ...... *if* there's not already.
In XHTML you want to be allowed to write markup like this:
<h:html xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">
...
For obvious reasons this doesn't work in HTML.
In HTML you want to write markup like this:
<script>
if(x<y) alert("<danger>")
</script>
For obvious reasons this doens't work in XHTML. Restricting either one so
that in theory you can copy and paste between them doesn't seem worth it.
> It's not just what I wish to do in the future. It's about the whole
> world, it's about all the documents that will be circulating out there.
> They will be incompatible with each other.
They already are. However, on a language level they are not incompatible.
> How on earth do you think that HTML5 and XHTML5 will live on the web at
> the same time without some type of increased normalisation between the
> two?
By using separate consumers that handle each in an appropriate way. You
need that anyway to deal with non-conforming HTML and XHTML using XML
features.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2007 16:44:20 UTC