- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:44:21 +0100
- To: "Dean Edridge" <dean@55.co.nz>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:25:27 +0100, Dean Edridge <dean@55.co.nz> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> There is no "the one syntax" > > But there could be ...... *if* there's not already. In XHTML you want to be allowed to write markup like this: <h:html xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"> ... For obvious reasons this doesn't work in HTML. In HTML you want to write markup like this: <script> if(x<y) alert("<danger>") </script> For obvious reasons this doens't work in XHTML. Restricting either one so that in theory you can copy and paste between them doesn't seem worth it. > It's not just what I wish to do in the future. It's about the whole > world, it's about all the documents that will be circulating out there. > They will be incompatible with each other. They already are. However, on a language level they are not incompatible. > How on earth do you think that HTML5 and XHTML5 will live on the web at > the same time without some type of increased normalisation between the > two? By using separate consumers that handle each in an appropriate way. You need that anyway to deal with non-conforming HTML and XHTML using XML features. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2007 16:44:20 UTC