- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:53:24 +0100
- To: "Dean Edridge" <dean@55.co.nz>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:36:56 +0100, Dean Edridge <dean@55.co.nz> wrote: > How do you propose that the W3C deal with the fact that there's about 10 > different ways to create a HTML5 document. > And more importantly what about the fact that not everyone in this group > can agree on what is "best practice". > I mean, the group can't even agree on what a XHTML document is, and the > W3C wont clarify this either. This will have to be dealt with sooner or > later. There are about ten different ways to create a document conforming to the XML syntax too. They are simply quite different. Restricting authors to use a subset of both doesn't seem particularly helpful especially given that in order to use existing content non-XML consuming software has to be used anyway. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2007 15:53:21 UTC