- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:13:52 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 12:48 -0500, Harry Halpin wrote: > >> By schedule I mean the one on our web-page that I got the CG to approve >> [1] a while back, going from Last Call to PR by the end of 1st Quarter >> 2007. The end of first call PR is March 31st. Therefore, we need to at >> very worse case go into Last Call for the minimum of 3 weeks, i.e. the >> end of the 1st week of March. However, ideally we'd have more time in >> Last Call. >> >> I think all the tests in the critical path have more or less worked out >> and issues are closed - it's a matter of editing the spec text, so I'm >> going to press for Last Call this telecon. >> > > (a) Jeremy Carroll just blew that idea out of the water with > his security considerations text; I can't claim we have > no open issues now. > > I'd just add his text in with minor modifications. > (b) going to PR on the same day we exit last call is > a 0-probability event. It's not impossible, but it's quite > unlikely; it has never happened in the past. > > OK. Therefore, we need to go into Last Call now. If not on the Spec, at least on Primer/Use-cases doc. > (c) what happened to discussion of a two month CR while we wait > for the IETF to register Profile:? The "feature at risk" > process is a CR thing. > http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#at-risk-feature > Two month wait? I thought you said you could get this sorted out by March 31st...Ivan did not wait to wait past end of 1st Quarter...as the IETF liason, if you have a proposal for this send it to semweb-coordination. >>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/#sched >>> >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/weekly-agenda >>>>> > > -- -harry Harry Halpin, University of Edinburgh http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:13:56 UTC