- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:40:31 -0600
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 13:13 -0500, Harry Halpin wrote: > Dan Connolly wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 12:48 -0500, Harry Halpin wrote: [...] > >> I think all the tests in the critical path have more or less worked out > >> and issues are closed - it's a matter of editing the spec text, so I'm > >> going to press for Last Call this telecon. > >> > > > > (a) Jeremy Carroll just blew that idea out of the water with > > his security considerations text; I can't claim we have > > no open issues now. > > > > > I'd just add his text in with minor modifications. That involves adding a conformance label for "GRDDL processor" or "GRDDL-aware agent". That's not something I think we should do in a hurry. I think we should publish what we have now, noting a few outstanding issues. And then go to last call after working them out. > > (b) going to PR on the same day we exit last call is > > a 0-probability event. It's not impossible, but it's quite > > unlikely; it has never happened in the past. > > > > > OK. Therefore, we need to go into Last Call now. If not on the Spec, at > least on Primer/Use-cases doc. > > (c) what happened to discussion of a two month CR while we wait > > for the IETF to register Profile:? The "feature at risk" > > process is a CR thing. > > http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#at-risk-feature > > > Two month wait? I thought you said you could get this sorted out by > March 31st. No. I said, and repeated for the record: Feb 09 10:36:01 <DanC> CG concurs with DanC's advice to do CR with feature-at-risk, waiting up to 2 months for IESG response Evidently we got our wires crossed. > ..Ivan did not wait to wait past end of 1st Quarter...as the > IETF liason, if you have a proposal for this send it to semweb-coordination. I think we should work this out between ourselves before bringing it back to the semweb-cg, though as indicated by the cc to www-archive, you're free to share this thread with anyone you'd like. > >>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/#sched > >>> > >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/weekly-agenda -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:40:58 UTC