- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:04:23 -0600
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 12:48 -0500, Harry Halpin wrote: > By schedule I mean the one on our web-page that I got the CG to approve > [1] a while back, going from Last Call to PR by the end of 1st Quarter > 2007. The end of first call PR is March 31st. Therefore, we need to at > very worse case go into Last Call for the minimum of 3 weeks, i.e. the > end of the 1st week of March. However, ideally we'd have more time in > Last Call. > > I think all the tests in the critical path have more or less worked out > and issues are closed - it's a matter of editing the spec text, so I'm > going to press for Last Call this telecon. (a) Jeremy Carroll just blew that idea out of the water with his security considerations text; I can't claim we have no open issues now. (b) going to PR on the same day we exit last call is a 0-probability event. It's not impossible, but it's quite unlikely; it has never happened in the past. (c) what happened to discussion of a two month CR while we wait for the IETF to register Profile:? The "feature at risk" process is a CR thing. http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#at-risk-feature > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/#sched > >>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/weekly-agenda -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:04:36 UTC