- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:20:16 +0100
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>, "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com>, steve@w3.org
- Cc: dino@w3.org, chris@w3.org, dbaron@dbaron.org, ian@hixie.ch, mjs@apple.com, w3c-html-cg@w3.org, timbl@w3.org, www-archive@w3.org
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:58:29 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com> wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:27:16 +0100, T.V Raman <raman@google.com> wrote: > >> I concurr with Steve, and strongly disagree with the later >> suggestion on this thread that two parallel versions of the >> charter be maintained with a pointer being passed around to the >> alternative --- I for one would not feel comfortable voting on >> either version of any of the charters if that were the case. > > I agree with Raman that having made the proposals they should stand. I > am disappointed that the feedback that various people including myself > raised seemed to have been ignored in the proposal, but W3C is like > that. I will make the same suggestions in my AC review, as significant > change requests. Hmm. I don't know which charter drafts I was reading. Some of the most significant changes I requested most strongly were in fact made in the proposal. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk chaals@opera.com Try Opera 9 now! http://opera.com
Received on Thursday, 23 November 2006 14:20:55 UTC