- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:49:27 +0300
- To: <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Cc: <sandro@w3.org>, <norman.walsh@sun.com>, <www-archive@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Danny Ayers [mailto:danny.ayers@gmail.com] > Sent: 20 October, 2004 13:24 > To: Stickler Patrick (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere) > Cc: sandro@w3.org; norman.walsh@sun.com; www-archive@w3.org > Subject: Re: referendum on httpRange-14 > > > On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:05:05 +0300, patrick.stickler@nokia.com > <patrick.stickler@nokia.com> wrote: > > (Jumping in because I have a similar UI requirement) > > > Yes, membership in the class of "web resources" should be > determinable > > based on web behavior, but membership is volitile, and so I would > > hesitate myself in making any persistent statements about such > > membership. > > But given that we haven't much in the way of widespread infrastructure > for handling volatility (the Semantic Web isn't exactly a temporal > database) I reckon the assumption of persistent "web" class membership > would be reasonable. Perhaps. > So the appropriate flag would be "web resource" > (last time I looked). > > Hmm, how about "Represented" as a label? > > > I'd have a default, generic view for "Resources", > > Or "Things"? How about Google's "I'm feeling lucky" ;-) Patrick
Received on Wednesday, 20 October 2004 11:49:54 UTC