- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:24:12 +0200
- To: "patrick.stickler@nokia.com" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: sandro@w3.org, norman.walsh@sun.com, www-archive@w3.org
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:05:05 +0300, patrick.stickler@nokia.com <patrick.stickler@nokia.com> wrote: (Jumping in because I have a similar UI requirement) > Yes, membership in the class of "web resources" should be determinable > based on web behavior, but membership is volitile, and so I would > hesitate myself in making any persistent statements about such > membership. But given that we haven't much in the way of widespread infrastructure for handling volatility (the Semantic Web isn't exactly a temporal database) I reckon the assumption of persistent "web" class membership would be reasonable. So the appropriate flag would be "web resource" (last time I looked). Hmm, how about "Represented" as a label? > I'd have a default, generic view for "Resources", Or "Things"? Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Wednesday, 20 October 2004 10:24:13 UTC