Re: Named graphs etc

Patrick Stickler wrote:

> Technically, it's a trivial addition. In practice, though, it requires 
> *every* RDF parser
> to be updated. And since the new specs just required all the parsers to 
> be revamped,
> retested, etc. I don't think the parser folks would be very keen about 
> *any* changes
> so soon after the new specs.


Realistically the time-to-deployment of any good ideas we have is years not 
months ...
And this isn't a huge change really.

Jeremy

Received on Friday, 12 March 2004 09:50:56 UTC