- From: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:46:51 +0100
- To: Masahide Kanzaki <post@kanzaki.com>
- Cc: semantic-photolist@unitboy.com
On 11.03.2004 08:43:29, Masahide Kanzaki wrote: >>A region of type Rectangle uses two pairs of comma-separated integers. the >>pairs are separated by a space. "0,0 50,100" could for example describe a >>rectangle that starts in the upper left corner of an image, has a width of 50 >>pixels and a height of 100 pixels (i.e. the first pair describes the upper >>left >>corner, the second one the lower right). > >I think this explanation is confusing re: whether the second pair "50,100" >means lower right coordinate, or with/height pair. I want it stay the same >as we discussed so far, as well as the existing Jim's vocab (where 50,100 >is the coordinate of lower bottom corner, rather than width/height pair). > >Maybe example such as "10,20 50,100" is less confusing, and write clearly >the latter pair is lower right coord, putting width/height notion into >parenthesis ? Thanks for the comments, Masahide. I agree. I removed the width/height stuff and changed the explanation to [[ A region of type Rectangle uses two pairs of comma-separated integers. the pairs are separated by a space. The first pair describes the upper left, the second one the lower right corner. An example coords value for a rectangle is "10,20 50,100" (upper_left_x=10, upper_left_y=20, lower_right_x=50, lower_right_y=100). ]] >>the value >>syntax for boundingBox is now {x1,y1,width,height}. > >I don't think this is the consensus. Though there was no clear conclusion, >I think it's better be {x1,y1 x2,y2} as Rectangle (see bellow). [1] oops, ok. I asked jim, morten and greg before I changed the doc. should I change it back again? I could live with any syntax. another irc meeting required? what are the pros/cons, use cases? {x1,y1,width,height}: + width and height can easily be extracted - lower right corner has to be calculated + people see that boundingBox != rectangle coords {x1,y1 x2,y2}: + lower right corner can easily be extracted - width and height have to be calculated + same syntax as for rectangle coords can't see a "huge" advantage of any of them.. /me clueless ;) benjamin -- Benjamin Nowack Kruppstr. 82-100 45145 Essen, Germany >-- >KANZAKI, Masahide a.k.a. masaka >http://kanzaki.com/info/webwho.rdf >mailto:webmaster(at)kanzaki.com >#Please use above address for a personal mail >#instead of post@kanzaki.com, which is for list only. ================= This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net. Subscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: subscribe Unsubscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: unsubscribe Help To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: help
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2004 15:05:26 UTC