W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > March 2004

Re: [w3photo] vocabulary update

From: Masahide Kanzaki <post@kanzaki.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:43:29 +0900
Message-Id: <p04320400bc754d831369@[[]]>
To: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
Cc: semantic-photolist@unitboy.com, Greg Elin <elin@unitboy.com>

Hi Benjamin, thanks for updates.

>the value
>syntax for boundingBox is now {x1,y1,width,height}.

I don't think this is the consensus. Though there was no clear conclusion,
I think it's better be {x1,y1 x2,y2} as Rectangle (see bellow). [1]

>A region of type Rectangle uses two pairs of comma-separated integers. the
>pairs are separated by a space. "0,0 50,100" could for example describe a
>rectangle that starts in the upper left corner of an image, has a width of 50
>pixels and a height of 100 pixels (i.e. the first pair describes the upper
>corner, the second one the lower right).

I think this explanation is confusing re: whether the second pair "50,100"
means lower right coordinate, or with/height pair. I want it stay the same
as we discussed so far, as well as the existing Jim's vocab (where 50,100
is the coordinate of lower bottom corner, rather than width/height pair).

Maybe example such as "10,20 50,100" is less confusing, and write clearly
the latter pair is lower right coord, putting width/height notion into
parenthesis ?



KANZAKI, Masahide a.k.a. masaka
#Please use above address for a personal mail
#instead of post@kanzaki.com, which is for list only.
This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History
Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net.

Subscribe Instructions
To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: subscribe

Unsubscribe Instructions
To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: unsubscribe

To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: help
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2004 18:45:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:25 UTC