- From: Masahide Kanzaki <post@kanzaki.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:43:29 +0900
- To: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
- Cc: semantic-photolist@unitboy.com, Greg Elin <elin@unitboy.com>
Hi Benjamin, thanks for updates. >the value >syntax for boundingBox is now {x1,y1,width,height}. I don't think this is the consensus. Though there was no clear conclusion, I think it's better be {x1,y1 x2,y2} as Rectangle (see bellow). [1] >A region of type Rectangle uses two pairs of comma-separated integers. the >pairs are separated by a space. "0,0 50,100" could for example describe a >rectangle that starts in the upper left corner of an image, has a width of 50 >pixels and a height of 100 pixels (i.e. the first pair describes the upper >left >corner, the second one the lower right). I think this explanation is confusing re: whether the second pair "50,100" means lower right coordinate, or with/height pair. I want it stay the same as we discussed so far, as well as the existing Jim's vocab (where 50,100 is the coordinate of lower bottom corner, rather than width/height pair). Maybe example such as "10,20 50,100" is less confusing, and write clearly the latter pair is lower right coord, putting width/height notion into parenthesis ? regards, [1] http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/discovery/chatlogs/foaf/2004-03-04.html#T15-37-39 -- KANZAKI, Masahide a.k.a. masaka http://kanzaki.com/info/webwho.rdf mailto:webmaster(at)kanzaki.com #Please use above address for a personal mail #instead of post@kanzaki.com, which is for list only. ================================== This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net. Subscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: subscribe Unsubscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: unsubscribe Help To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: help
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2004 18:45:05 UTC