- From: Masahide Kanzaki <post@kanzaki.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:30:52 +0900
- To: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
- Cc: semantic-photolist@unitboy.com
Benjamin, thank you very much for prompt action. New description for Rectangle looks very clear. >{x1,y1,width,height}: >+ width and height can easily be extracted >- lower right corner has to be calculated >+ people see that boundingBox != rectangle coords > >{x1,y1 x2,y2}: >+ lower right corner can easily be extracted >- width and height have to be calculated >+ same syntax as for rectangle coords > >can't see a "huge" advantage of any of them.. >/me clueless ;) Well, since both Rectangle and BBox are the same type of shape, application can reuse the same codes to process them if both use {x1,y1 x2,y2} value. But, it's not difficult to process {x1,y1,width,height} value, I'm fine with this if there is specific reason to choose this. Personally, I don't think another IRC meeting is required. Just providing rationale is enough. cheers :) -- KANZAKI, Masahide a.k.a. masaka http://kanzaki.com/info/webwho.rdf mailto:webmaster(at)kanzaki.com #Please use above address for a personal mail #instead of post@kanzaki.com, which is for list only. ================================== This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net. Subscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: subscribe Unsubscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: unsubscribe Help To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: help
Received on Friday, 12 March 2004 03:35:43 UTC