W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > March 2004

Re: [w3photo] vocabulary update

From: Masahide Kanzaki <post@kanzaki.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:30:52 +0900
Message-Id: <p04320400bc7722f5c157@[[]]>
To: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
Cc: semantic-photolist@unitboy.com

Benjamin, thank you very much for prompt action.

New description for Rectangle looks very clear.

>+ width and height can easily be extracted
>- lower right corner has to be calculated
>+ people see that boundingBox != rectangle coords
>{x1,y1 x2,y2}:
>+ lower right corner can easily be extracted
>- width and height have to be calculated
>+ same syntax as for rectangle coords
>can't see a "huge" advantage of any of them..
>/me clueless ;)

Well, since both Rectangle and BBox are the same type of shape, application
can reuse the same codes to process them if both use {x1,y1 x2,y2} value.
But, it's not difficult to process {x1,y1,width,height} value, I'm fine
with this if there is specific reason to choose this.

Personally, I don't think another IRC meeting is required. Just providing
rationale is enough.

cheers :)

KANZAKI, Masahide a.k.a. masaka
#Please use above address for a personal mail
#instead of post@kanzaki.com, which is for list only.
This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History
Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net.

Subscribe Instructions
To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: subscribe

Unsubscribe Instructions
To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: unsubscribe

To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: help
Received on Friday, 12 March 2004 03:35:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:25 UTC