Re: [w3photo] Naming sites and activities

On 15/1/04 5:08 pm, "Greg Elin" <greg@fotonotes.net> wrote:

> Hugh,
> 
> Very thoughtful and I'm interested to hear what others think. It is
> possible though that w3photo.org makes sense for the stored repository
> of images...even as it grows. However, I think you are right about this
> is rapidly growing in scope and maybe there is a better name!
> 
> Greg
> 
> 
Good thinking.
Perhaps the photos + metadata (or index to them) could be on a labelled
w3photo (w3c.org/w3photo and/or w3photo.org). Separate out that resource
from the other activities.
confs.com has gone, confs.net confs.org are available.
Better thoughts?
Now copied to list.
Best.
Hugh
-- 
Hugh Glaser, Declarative Systems & Software Engineering
              School of Electronics and Computer Science,
              University of Southampton,
              Southampton SO17 1BJ
Work: +44 (0)23 8059 3670, Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 3045
Mobile: +44 (0)77 0355 0122, Home: +44 (0)23 8061 5652
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~hg/


==================================
This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History
Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net.

Subscribe Instructions
To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: subscribe

Unsubscribe Instructions
To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: unsubscribe

Help
To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: help

Received on Thursday, 15 January 2004 18:58:13 UTC