- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 17:17:21 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>, www-archive@w3.org
>Jeremy Carroll wrote: > >> >>This is now the submitted version (the PDF is one I have downloaded >>from the site, after having uploaded it) > >Another one. > >Changes are mainly trivial; the most significant changes are 1 >substantive change to Pat's text in section 2, and wording >alignments between sections 2 and 6.2 (also Pat's text). > >Acknowledgements now fit. > >The substantive change is that the old text talked about >interpretations of named graphs, and said that if I satisfies g then >I(name(g)) = g; I don't believe we interpret named graphs at all, >merely the graphs (or a merge thereof) within the named graphs. I don't understand this at all. (Named graphs are graphs with names, right?) But.... > Hence I have changed this to say that an interpretation conforms >with a set of named graphs N if for every ng in N then I(name(ng)) = >ng. .... as far as I can see this amounts to the same thing, so I have no problem with that change. >I have followed Chris's suggestion and capitalized Named Graph >throughout, but personally I find it ugly. Me too. Maybe it looks better in German than in English. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Saturday, 17 April 2004 18:17:24 UTC