Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>
> This is now the submitted version (the PDF is one I have downloaded from
> the site, after having uploaded it)
Another one.
Changes are mainly trivial; the most significant changes are 1 substantive
change to Pat's text in section 2, and wording alignments between sections
2 and 6.2 (also Pat's text).
Acknowledgements now fit.
The substantive change is that the old text talked about interpretations of
named graphs, and said that if I satisfies g then I(name(g)) = g; I don't
believe we interpret named graphs at all, merely the graphs (or a merge
thereof) within the named graphs. Hence I have changed this to say that an
interpretation conforms with a set of named graphs N if for every ng in N
then I(name(ng)) = ng.
I have followed Chris's suggestion and capitalized Named Graph throughout,
but personally I find it ugly.
Jeremy