W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > April 2004

Re: overlength version

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:16:32 +0100
Message-ID: <408190A0.40704@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>, www-archive@w3.org
Jeremy Carroll wrote:

> This is now the submitted version (the PDF is one I have downloaded from 
> the site, after having uploaded it)

Another one.

Changes are mainly trivial; the most significant changes are 1 substantive 
change to Pat's text in section 2, and wording alignments between sections 
2 and 6.2 (also Pat's text).

Acknowledgements now fit.

The substantive change is that the old text talked about interpretations of 
named graphs, and said that if I satisfies g then I(name(g)) = g; I don't 
believe we interpret named graphs at all, merely the graphs (or a merge 
thereof) within the named graphs. Hence I have changed this to say that an 
interpretation conforms with a set of named graphs N if for every ng in N 
then I(name(ng)) = ng.

I have followed Chris's suggestion and capitalized Named Graph throughout, 
but personally I find it ugly.


Received on Saturday, 17 April 2004 16:17:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:27 UTC