- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 09:42:24 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Hi Dan, I spotted your slide on Curried function notation, which of course has great resonance with my programming in Haskell (Haskell was Curry's first name). The recent-ish discussion about RDFPath languages in RDFIG had startyed me thinking about using Curried functions as a kind of path notation -- something I could experiment with using my RDF-in-Haskell software. Consider a path context (a node or set of nodes, I'm not sure) and a path expression being a function that "moves" from one path context to another. Complex sub-paths could be expressed by function composition, so it should be possible to build an expressive path language from a few simple primitives. #g -- At 08:59 15/11/03 +0900, you wrote: >I got kinda inspired on the plane, and I'd like to talk >about this in the meeting this week... > > WebArch Diagrams > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/fdesc54/ > >-- >Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Saturday, 15 November 2003 04:46:08 UTC