- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 09:44:18 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Tim said something very like this a while ago. I thought the distinction drawn between identifier and reference was helpful. #g -- At 14:42 15/11/03 +0900, Dan Connolly wrote: >"A link is built from two pieces: > a base URI > a URI reference" > -- http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/webarch-20031111/#links > >I think URI references are an irrelevant detail >when discussing links. > >URI references are shorthand for URIs in general, >not just in links. > >And the fact that URIs have a shorthand form isn't >very interesting when discussing links. > >Sorry I don't have a replacement to suggest just now, >I'm writing from the meeting. > > >-- >Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Saturday, 15 November 2003 04:46:08 UTC