- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 13:50:56 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org, wware@alum.mit.edu
Hi Sandro, sorry to jump in the discussion, but it's because it reminds me something. Le jeudi, 28 aoû 2003, à 08:05 America/Montreal, Sandro Hawke a écrit : > The truth is cwm is being quite actively worked on, but it's not being > all that carefully release-engineered. You're working with the live > developers tree, and once in a while someone screws up and checks in > something that wont even pass the regression tests. That was me. :-( In the past, I asked if it was possible to have tarball of the cwm package. When you think a version is stable, just make a simple swap-stable.tar.gz and keep a version number to the cvs tree. So people will be able to use it without too much problems.
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2003 13:50:57 UTC