- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 16:33:52 -0400
- To: Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM
- Cc: "Carine Bournez (E-mail)" <carine@w3.org>, fallside@us.ibm.com, Nilo Mitra <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>, Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM, Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, W3C Public Archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Both as an editor and as one of the people who has had a dual affiliation, I'm OK with whatever our chair suggests is appropriate. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM> Sent by: Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM 04/14/2003 03:48 PM To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com> cc: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM@Lotus, "Carine Bournez (E-mail)" <carine@w3.org>, David Fallside/Santa Teresa/IBM@IBMUS, Nilo Mitra <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>, W3C Public Archive <www-archive@w3.org> Subject: Re: SOAP 1.2 PR Documents On Monday, Apr 14, 2003, at 15:25 US/Eastern, Martin Gudgin wrote: > > Mark Baker (Idokorro Mobile (PlanetFred), formerly of Sun Microsystems) > Don Box (Microsoft Corporation, formerly of DevelopMentor) > > Does that style work for everyone? > Works for me. > This does also beg the question of what we should do with people like > Noah and I who appear in both prevwgmb.txt and wgmb.txt > I'd vote for removal from prevwgmb and adoption of the style above in wgmb. Marc. > Gudge > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Yves Lafon [mailto:ylafon@w3.org] >> Sent: 14 April 2003 15:26 >> To: Martin Gudgin >> Cc: Noah Mendelsohn; Carine Bournez (E-mail); David Fallside; >> Nilo Mitra; Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Jean-Jacques Moreau; Marc >> Hadley; W3C Public Archive >> >> On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Martin Gudgin wrote: >> >>> I fixed the typo. >> >> Btw, I updated the participant list in the WG page (Jeff >> Schlimmer was missing). Also, Don Box is listed as alumni for >> DevelopMentor, should we add another entry for alumni from >> MS? keep as-is? move to MS? >> I see that Mark Baker is listed twice on the page and >> remember that someone complained about that. >> >>> >>> Gudge >>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Noah Mendelsohn [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com] >>>> Sent: 11 April 2003 20:51 >>>> To: Martin Gudgin >>>> Cc: Carine Bournez (E-mail); David Fallside; Nilo Mitra; Henrik >>>> Frystyk Nielsen; Jean-Jacques Moreau; Marc Hadley; W3C Public >>>> Archive; ylafon@w3.org >>>> >>>> I took a look at the comments changes. Basically OK, but >> there is >>>> at least one spelling error: >>>> >>>> <current> >>>> Comment information items MAY appear as children and/or >> descendants >>>> of the [document element] element information item but >> not before or >>>> after that element informaton item . >>>> There are some restrictions in the processing model with >> respect to >>>> when comment information items can be added and/or removed (see >>>> 2.7.2.1 Relayed Infoset). >>>> </current> >>>> <minimalChangetoFixSpelling> >>>> Comment information items MAY appear as children and/or >> descendants >>>> of the [document element] element information item but >> not before or >>>> after that element >information< item . There are some >> restrictions >>>> in the processing model with respect to when comment information >>>> items can be added and/or removed (see 2.7.2.1 Relayed Infoset). >>>> </minimalChangetoFixSpelling> >>>> >>>> <possibleAdditionalChangetoMakeClearer?> >>>>> Although not explicitly called out in the sections >> below,< comment >>>> information items MAY appear >in the Envelope infoset< as >> children >>>> and/or descendants of the [document element] element information >>>> item, but not before or after that element >>>>> information< item. There are some restrictions in the >>>> processing model with respect to when comment information >> items can >>>> be added and/or removed (see 2.7.2.1 Relayed Infoset). >>>> </possibleAdditionalChangetoMakeClearer?> >>>> >>>> Reasons for proposed additional changes: (1) makes clear >> that lack >>>> of discussion below is intentional (2) make clear that we do >>>> consider these part of the Envelope infoset and thus subject to >>>> transmission. I think >>>> that's the only coherent interpretation anyway, but >> someone might be >>>> tempted to look at the sort of oblique introduction of >> comments at >>>> the top of the chapter and say: "well, if they really mattered, >>>> they would have been called out properly." My proposal >> to make it >>>> an explicit note failed, so I'm wondering if this helps a bit. >>>> >>>> Honestly, I'm not pushing either of these changes hard. >> If all we >>>> want to do is fix the spelling, or to adopt just the first of the >>>> additional changes, I'm fine with that. Thanks. >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 >>>> IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 >>>> One Rogers Street >>>> Cambridge, MA 02142 >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> >>>> 04/11/2003 09:35 AM >>>> >>>> >>>> To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" >>>> <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr> >>>> cc: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" >>>> <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "Marc Hadley" >>>> <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Nilo Mitra" >>>> <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, Noah >>>> Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM@Lotus, "W3C Public Archive" >>>> <www-archive@w3.org>, <ylafon@w3.org>, David Fallside/Santa >>>> Teresa/IBM@IBMUS, "Carine Bournez \(E-mail\)" <carine@w3.org> >>>> Subject: RE: SOAP 1.2 PR Documents >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, I added a paragraph to the start of Section 5[1] and removed >>>> the entry from Section 1[2] >>>> >>>> Gudge >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/04/11/soap12-part1.html#soapenv >>>> [2] >>>> http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/04/11/soap12-part1.html#notation >>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Jean-Jacques Moreau >>>>> [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr] >>>>> Sent: 11 April 2003 14:26 >>>>> To: Martin Gudgin >>>>> Cc: Jean-Jacques Moreau; Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Marc >> Hadley; Nilo >>>>> Mitra; Noah Mendelson; W3C Public Archive; ylafon@w3.org; David >>>>> Fallside; Carine Bournez (E-mail) >>>>> >>>>> The AI list also mentions issue 355: >>>>>> 2003/04/09: Editors >>>>>> Incorporate 'proper' of Issue 355 (not fully implemented >>>>>> previously) >>>>> >>>>> So did you do both of 421 and 422? >>>>> >>>>> JJ. >>>>> >>>>> Martin Gudgin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think the only issue resolutions were 421 and 422 ( >>>>> Comments and the >>>>>> redundant namespace entry in the table in Part 1 ). >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm sorting out the TOC now, Yves is on holiday >>>>>> >>>>>> Gudge >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Jean-Jacques Moreau >>>> [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr] >>>>>>> Sent: 11 April 2003 14:22 >>>>>>> To: Martin Gudgin >>>>>>> Cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Marc Hadley; Nilo Mitra; Noah >>>>> Mendelson; >>>>>>> W3C Public Archive; ylafon@w3.org; David Fallside; Carine >>>>>>> Bournez >>>>>>> (E-mail) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ah... I was planning on spending some time this afternoon >>>>> incoporating >>>>>>> issue resolutions. Did you also do any of that? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Apart from this (and cleaning up the TOC! -but Yves is good >>>>> at doing >>>>>>> this!-), I don't see anything else that needs doing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for creating the snapshots, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> JJ. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> PS. I'll on IRC shortly to speed up communication. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Martin Gudgin wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As you may have seen from mail from me on the WG >> list, the spec >>>>>>>> documents have been updated for PR. I've made the agreed >>>> changes, >>>>>>>> removed diff markup and removed change logs. I've generated >>>>>>> >>>>>>> snap shots >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> at each stage of the process. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think all that needs doing now is the following: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1. Update namespace URIs >>>>>>>> 2. Update status/boilerplate for PR >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does anyone know of anything else that needs doing? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm happy to do #1 for all three parts + schemas docs, I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> just need to >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> know what URIs we're going to use. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm hoping Yves/Carine can do #2 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gudge >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Yves Lafon - W3C >> "Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras." >> >> >> -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Monday, 14 April 2003 16:42:20 UTC