- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:59:28 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
Hi Dan, On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 09:11:02AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > I'm not sure how I feel about having something like this in the arch > doc, From a scope perspective, it's borderline, for sure. But I think the pros outweigh the cons, in that this information will permit readers to better evaluate whether or not the architectural principles (and therefore the Web) are relevant to the problems they're trying to solve in software. > but I know I wrote something like it before. In case you > also find it relevant: Yes, I enjoyed reading the paper very much. But "all" it says is that the Web evaluates fairly well to Englebart's requirements, not what kinds of tasks hypermedia permits to be coordinated over a network between humans and/or machines. Thanks. MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 10:48:06 UTC