- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 11 Jul 2002 09:11:02 -0500
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 08:02, Mark Baker wrote: [...] > I'd really like to see something in the architecture document that talks > about the "range of Web architecture"; what sorts of tasks can be > coordinated between Web agents, be they human or machine? For example, > is Web architecture sufficient(*) to permit two parties to coordinate > the purchase of a some shoes, without human intervention? What about > three or more parties? etc.. > > If this is something folks would like to see, I'd be happy to write up > some strawman text. I'm not sure how I feel about having something like this in the arch doc, but I know I wrote something like it before. In case you also find it relevant: [[ Abstract The architecture and implementation of the World Wide Web are evaluated with respect to Douglas Engelbart's requirements for an open hyperdocument system. Engelbart's requirements are derived from experience in using computer-supported collaborative work (CSCW) to support large scale electronic commerce. [...] Conclusions Support for Engelbart's requirements is far from ubiquitous. But the architecture in no way prevents them from being realized, and the quantity of resources integrated into the system provides ample motivation for research and development. In each area where facilities to meet the requirement are not ubiquitous, a demonstration of sufficient facilities has taken place. This gives confidence that the requirements will eventually be met and become infrastructure. If in fact Engelbart's requirements are an effective way to measure the viability of a platform for electronic commerce, the Web is very likely to be a viable platform for some time to come. ]] -- An Evaluation of the World Wide Web with respect to Engelbart's Requirements Daniel W. Connolly W3CMIT LCS $Date: 2001/01/12 00:09:30 $ http://www.w3.org/Architecture/NOTE-ioh-arch -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 10:10:13 UTC