- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 10:30:23 -0800
- To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "Noah Mendelson" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
We should definitely put them in the change log. I take it you meant to say 'ask the WG for license to fix' rather than 'ask the WG to fix' Gudge > -----Original Message----- > From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen > Sent: 04 December 2002 10:25 > To: Martin Gudgin; W3C Public Archive; Jean-Jacques Moreau; > Marc Hadley; Nilo Mitra; Noah Mendelson > Subject: RE: Some editorial tweaks > > > > These seem find to me. What I would suggest is that we as > part of the plan for the next week ask the WG to fix > editorial inconsistencies given the changes that has been > made to the spec during last call as long as we document them > in a change log. > > Does this make sense? > > Henrik Frystyk Nielsen > mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com > > >I read through Part 1 last night and noted that there are > >several things that need editorial attention/clarification. > >Here is a list of the things I noted, in the order they appear > >in the spec. BTW - I'm happy to make all these changes > >sometime before close of business Monday. >
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2002 13:30:55 UTC