- From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 13:46:42 -0500
- To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "Noah Mendelson" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Aren't we going to remove the change log as part of removing the diff markup ? Marc. On Wednesday, Dec 4, 2002, at 13:30 US/Eastern, Martin Gudgin wrote: > We should definitely put them in the change log. > > I take it you meant to say 'ask the WG for license to fix' rather than > 'ask the WG to fix' > > Gudge > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen >> Sent: 04 December 2002 10:25 >> To: Martin Gudgin; W3C Public Archive; Jean-Jacques Moreau; >> Marc Hadley; Nilo Mitra; Noah Mendelson >> Subject: RE: Some editorial tweaks >> >> >> >> These seem find to me. What I would suggest is that we as >> part of the plan for the next week ask the WG to fix >> editorial inconsistencies given the changes that has been >> made to the spec during last call as long as we document them >> in a change log. >> >> Does this make sense? >> >> Henrik Frystyk Nielsen >> mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com >> >>> I read through Part 1 last night and noted that there are >>> several things that need editorial attention/clarification. >>> Here is a list of the things I noted, in the order they appear >>> in the spec. BTW - I'm happy to make all these changes >>> sometime before close of business Monday. >> > > -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2002 13:46:34 UTC