- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 10:25:21 -0800
- To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "Noah Mendelson" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
These seem find to me. What I would suggest is that we as part of the plan for the next week ask the WG to fix editorial inconsistencies given the changes that has been made to the spec during last call as long as we document them in a change log. Does this make sense? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com >I read through Part 1 last night and noted that there are >several things that need editorial attention/clarification. >Here is a list of the things I noted, in the order they appear >in the spec. BTW - I'm happy to make all these changes >sometime before close of business Monday.
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2002 13:26:31 UTC