- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 13:11:29 -0800
- To: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>
- Cc: <Chris.Ferris@sun.com>, <fallside@us.ibm.com>, <gdaniels@macromedia.com>, <highland.m.mountain@intel.com>, <hugo@w3.org>, <jones@research.att.com>, <marc.hadley@sun.com>, <ohurley@iona.com>, <ylafon@w3.org>, <www-archive@w3.org>
Maybe I missed something but I thought the following two paragraphs should be combined to one: "The combination of the SOAP extensibility model and the SOAP binding framework provides some flexibility in the way that particular featuresand MEPs can be expressed: They can be expressed entirely within the SOAP envelope (as blocks), outside the envelope (typically in a manner that is specific to the underlying protocol), or as a combination of such expressions. It is up to the communicating nodes to decide how best to express particular features and MEPs; often when a binding-level implementation for a particular feature is available, utilizing it when appropriate will provide for optimized processing." Futhermore, isn't the ednote addressed at this text and not at the bottom paragraph? Shouldn't the ednote be place after the text above? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2001 16:12:37 UTC