RE: Annotea Schemas

OK makes sense, thank you for your answer.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marja-Riitta Koivunen [mailto:marja@w3.org]
> Sent: 1. august 2002 20:30
> To: Claus; www-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Annotea Schemas
> 
> 
> No need for fear.
> 
> We wanted to separate them so that people not wanting to use 
> our Annotation 
> subtypes can still use  the basic Annotation schema and just 
> include their 
> own types. For instance, Amaya has a a special file 
> (config/annot.schemas 
> in the Amaya installation directory) that can be edited to 
> define what 
> schemas to include. Right now we always use both definitions.
> 
> Marja
> 
> At 12:33 PM 8/1/2002 +0200, Claus wrote:
> 
> >In deepest fear of this beeing a stupid question
> >I was wandering if anyone could please explain
> >to me why the rdfs:Class Annotation resides in
> >
> >http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotation-ns#
> >
> >When all other rdfs:Class' are in
> >
> >http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotationType#
> >
> >What is the difference? Thanks in advance.
> >
> >/Claus
> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 5 August 2002 12:02:11 UTC