- From: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 14:30:12 -0400
- To: "Claus" <filter@privat.dk>, <www-annotation@w3.org>
No need for fear. We wanted to separate them so that people not wanting to use our Annotation subtypes can still use the basic Annotation schema and just include their own types. For instance, Amaya has a a special file (config/annot.schemas in the Amaya installation directory) that can be edited to define what schemas to include. Right now we always use both definitions. Marja At 12:33 PM 8/1/2002 +0200, Claus wrote: >In deepest fear of this beeing a stupid question >I was wandering if anyone could please explain >to me why the rdfs:Class Annotation resides in > >http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotation-ns# > >When all other rdfs:Class' are in > >http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotationType# > >What is the difference? Thanks in advance. > >/Claus
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2002 14:31:00 UTC