- From: Brereton, Stephen <stephen.brereton@york.gov.uk>
- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:53:05 +0100
- To: "'www-amaya@w3.org'" <www-amaya@w3.org>
You'll almost certainly find this is an 'update Amaya' situation. However bad M$ are, they have made vast improvements to their Mac ripoff with XP, but this has brought with it far tighter standards control. The great MM Dreamweaver (and M$'s Frontpage) are both far more stable than any Amaya I've ever seen, and they both behave very nicely under XP. -----Original Message----- From: Kade Hansson [mailto:kade.hansson@dpiwe.tas.gov.au] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 1:37 AM To: www-amaya@w3.org Subject: Re: Windows XP SP2 error Michael.Giroux@objectweb.org wrote: >My system was upgraded to Windows XP SP2, and now I'm getting an error >when I open Amaya and when I try to click on any link in an HTML document. > >The error message is: > >(source: WIN_TtaSetToggleMenu(1) Error 1401) > >I'll watch for an update so I can resume using Amaya. > > To Windows or to Amaya? Do Microsoft let you downgrade, because that is the most immediate solution? I would be reporting your error to Microsoft, and giving the Amaya team as a contact, for they may be able to add to your bug report, and show the code in question which is now failing. I would hope the Amaya team place a higher priority on actual bugfixes and extensions than fooling around with a proven flaky operating system. At any rate, how do we know MS haven't deliberately sabotaged their operating system to promote sales of their web authoring solution? There certainly is precedent (Windows on DR DOS was broken to promote MS DOS.) Archer End. * * * * * * * * * * * * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This email represents the personal views of the author/sender. The author/sender has no authority or delegation to bind the City of York Council by this e-mail and the City of York Council accepts no responsibility whatsoever for its contents. Please note that any reply to this email may be screened.
Received on Thursday, 12 August 2004 08:55:12 UTC