- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 16:17:23 +0200
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Geoff Freed <geoff_freed@wgbh.org>, Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, HTMLwg <public-html@w3.org>
Charles McCathieNevile, Sun, 01 May 2011 22:29:42 +0200: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 19:31:11 +0200, Laura Carlson : > >> Hi Ben, >> >>> The spec language likely needs to be carefully coordinated with: >>> >>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/links.html#following-hyperlinks >> >> What text would you suggest for for longdesc in the 4.8.1 the img >> element section? I'm open to suggestions. >> >>> especially if its intended to encourage implementations such >>> as inline replacement, which the text above would seem to discourage. >>> >>> Most of the quoted text looks like it belongs in the informative >>> "Rendering" section rather than in the section describing the "img" >>> element: >>> >>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/rendering.html#links-forms-and-navigation >> >> We certainly could place it there. What do other people think? > > Makes sense. [...] +1 To place it in rendering section rather than dropping. -- Leif H Silli
Received on Monday, 2 May 2011 14:22:35 UTC