Re: Use of role="application" for flash files

I can see the benefit of using application on a Flash movie for the  
sake of landmark navigation, but it also is intended to communicate to  
the UA/AT to switch from ‘document browsing’ mode into ‘application  
interface’ mode, so it doesn’t make as much sense b/c Flash movies  
aren’t ARIA applications. In a sense, because Flash isn’t accessible  
on all systems, and because the interface is very different from the  
web browser’s interface, the author is promising the user something  
they can’t always deliver, or may not deliver in the way the user  
expects.

In theory, on the platforms where Flash is accessible, the Flash  
player could/should communicate role, state, and property information  
directly to the accessibility API, instead of going through the  
browser via ARIA.


On Jan 16, 2009, at 9:07 AM, Victor Tsaran wrote:

>
> I think in general this is a good idea. However, considering how many
> Flash movies on the Internet are inaccessible, this may cause more
> confusion for the end-user if they are suddenly are left with no  
> virtual
> cursor and, subsequently, no ability to review the movie's content.
> Victor
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wai-xtech-request@w3.org [mailto:wai-xtech-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Steven Faulkner
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 8:09 AM
> To: W3C WAI-XTECH
> Cc: w3c-wai-pf@w3.org PF
> Subject: Use of role="application" for flash files
>
>
> I recieved a question about the use of role="application" for Flash
> files in web pages.
> My response was
> "The role of application does something quite specific, it tells the  
> AT
> to switch modes (if the AT uses them). It was only added as a landmark
> role the other day, so I don't think the PF WG have thought about it  
> in
> terms of its landmark use. It would make sense for a flash movie  
> that is
> an interactive widget to be given a role="application" i guess..."
> (http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/?p=106)
>
>
> any thoughts or guidance on this?
>
> While on this subject, with the behaviour of some AT being the  
> switching
> of modes when a container with role="application" is encountered, will
> this not have a negative effect upon the navigability of landmark  
> roles,
> as it is my understanding that landmark role navigation will only work
> in virtual mode?
>
> --
> with regards
>
> Steve Faulkner
> Technical Director - TPG Europe
> Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium
>
> www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org
> Web Accessibility Toolbar -
> http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
>
>

Received on Friday, 16 January 2009 19:22:56 UTC