- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:55:52 -0500
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>
Hi Sam, > In all cases, the sentence that follows "The issue should not be closed" > should to identify (a) what is the next action, (b) who is the owner of > that action, and (c) when that action is targeted to be complete. longdesc is currently a "raised" not an "open", not a "pending review" not a "postponed" issue. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/30 The definition of a raised [1] issue does not require an action. RAISED = A working group member suggests this is worth a WG discussion and potentially a decision, but to date no concrete proposal has been created that enjoys a consensus of at least one. The definition of closed [1] is: CLOSED = The chairs believe either the WG has resolved the issue (via spec editing) or the issue has been withdrawn. Only the chairs should move issues to 'closed'. Typically moving issues from PENDINGREVIEW to CLOSED will involve review in the weekly telecon. Has the WG has resolved the issue (via spec editing) or has the issue has been withdrawn? We reviewed and edited the Tracker definitions a year ago: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/70 http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20080717#l-310 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-announce/2008JulSep/0017.html > For my part, I'm doing everything humanly possible to get Ian the answers > he needs to continue to make progress. Thank you. Much appreciated. Best Regards, Laura [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/#head-47c0b55d661dcf93f76d586ddbe292c9abc597e4 -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 18:56:36 UTC