- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 05:39:48 -0500
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, "wai-liaison@w3.org" <wai-liaison@w3.org>, Steve Faulkner <sfaulkner@paciellogroup.com>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
Hi Sam, You wrote to John [1]: > The way I would prefer to proceed with issues like this is for people > like yourself to draft an even-toned text expressing the fact that this > is an "open issue" (indicated in red boxes in the document, and marked > up with class="XXX") and for the draft to be published after this has > been added to the document. By even toned, I mean that things like > "unresolved" and "direct contradiction with WCAG 2 Guidance" are fine, In addition to publishing the spec or specs I suggest publishing the Design Principles with an appropriate "open issue" marker, noting the concern regarding the accessibility principle, if Maciej does not incorporate the requested changes [2] [3]. The following is suggested text for the notice: "The meaning of accessibility in the accessibility design principle conflicts with the W3C Web Accessibility Initiative's meaning of accessibility. [4] Other related unresolved issues have been identified regarding the accessibility principle." Best Regards, Laura [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jul/0908.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jun/0661.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jul/0249.html [4] http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Sunday, 2 August 2009 10:40:24 UTC