RE: XAG 2.3 and xlink

> Can someone construct a shapshot of where the TAG is on the 
> XLink:HLink
> issue?  It is clear that the Web Community is not as much of 
> one mind on an
> appropriate-use profile for binding methods as we appear to 
> assume by the
> current XAG language.

To my reading there was no resolution. It appeared to be
clarification from both sides as to why its not in HTML.
 Agreed XLINK has not got the broad support for wider adoption
so I'm all for a move to broaden XAG. My only addition might be
a statement that AT should be able to derive the information that
this is an off page link, either from content or syntax.

DaveP

- 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 
system.

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk

Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 04:50:22 UTC