- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 16:12:10 -0500
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- CC: WAI Cross-group list <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > Issue: the object element can poiint to a plugin application instead of > allowing the user to choose the most useful one. > > Details: > > According to most guides for using the object element with Internet Explorer, > the way to specify multimedia content is to refer to a particular ActiveX > control, which specifies the player to be used for the object data. > > For example, there is a classid for the Adobe SVG plugin, and this is what > gets specified. If a user has an accessibility need for a different plugin > (for example a talking plugin), as I understand it they are unable to use > that instead without major poking about in the systems innards. > > This contradicts the requirements statement for plugin interfaces > http://www.w3.org/TR/CX developed by the hypertext coordination group. > > It should also, I think, lead to > 1. A requirement on XHTML 2 to change the way these things are specified > 2. A requirement / technique in user agent guidelines that a user can specify > the player to be used for a given content type A similar requirement we considered (but rejected) was "The UA must hand off focus to ATs." This is certainly true, but not strictly an accessibility requirement; it affects anyone who wants to use a plugin. This seems more appropriate for /TR/CX or Common User Agent Problems, and as you say, format specifications or XAG. _ Ian -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 16:12:01 UTC