Re: [XAG] merge 1.1 and 1.2?

In a sense these two checkpoints are emphasising different aspects of the
same requirement. because the part identified in 1.2 is so important I would
suggest we leave them seperate for now, although if we get more comments like
this we should reconsider it.

Cheers

Chaals

On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:


  This question comes from Astrid Callista, and I am forwarding it with
  permission:


    I'm under the impression that both points (1.1 and 1.2) have the same
    meaning. I may have misunderstood it, but I think that the main idea behind
    these 2 points is basically: to provide alternative equivalents of the
    content or a description of the content. If so, can't I just merge these 2
    points in one?



-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI  fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)

Received on Sunday, 23 June 2002 19:25:52 UTC