- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 19:25:51 -0400 (EDT)
- To: WAI Cross-group list <wai-xtech@w3.org>
In a sense these two checkpoints are emphasising different aspects of the same requirement. because the part identified in 1.2 is so important I would suggest we leave them seperate for now, although if we get more comments like this we should reconsider it. Cheers Chaals On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: This question comes from Astrid Callista, and I am forwarding it with permission: I'm under the impression that both points (1.1 and 1.2) have the same meaning. I may have misunderstood it, but I think that the main idea behind these 2 points is basically: to provide alternative equivalents of the content or a description of the content. If so, can't I just merge these 2 points in one? -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Sunday, 23 June 2002 19:25:52 UTC